I
have been fascinated with science from the time as I was a little boy. I
remember being intrigued as I peered for the first time at the wing of a fly through
the eyepiece of my microscope. I bought science equipment at our local drug
store, with the desire to do experiments, even though I didn’t know what that
really entailed.
Those
early interests in science blossomed into a degree in biology at college. I
almost didn’t complete my degree because I took too many biology classes.
During my time in college I was able to dig deeply into the realities of our world.
One of my favorite classes was a class in endocrinology. During that class, I
was able to observe the significant changes that happen in an animal when a
specific hormone was removed. I was also fascinated by my class in genetics.
Working with fruit flies, I saw firsthand how genetic characteristics are
passed on from one generation to the next. I also saw the changes that can take
place in a population over time.
During
my journey through my biology degree, I encountered the theory of evolution. I quickly
became aware of two very different applications of this theory. The one
application is what I will call micro-evolution. This is the gradual changes
that take place within specific species. This is the type of evolution that Darwin
observed during his monumental discoveries in the Galapagos Islands. Everyone
who has studied populations can attest to this type of natural selection.
The
other type of evolution is what I am calling macro-evolution. This is the
theory that the kind of evolution we can observe within species took place
between species to create new species. This is the classic microbe to man
theory of evolution. After observing micro-evolution, Darwin extrapolated the
concept to explain how all life forme;, moving from single cell organisms to
the enormous diversity we see today.
I have been reading a new book by F. LaGard
Smith that has masterfully exposed some of the insurmountable obstacles to macro-evolution.
The title of the book is Darwin’s Secret Sex Problem. I highly recommend
this book to anyone who is willing to take an honest look at the now
universally excepted theory of evolution. Smith affirms the truth of
micro-evolution while raising serious questions about macro-evolution. At the
heart of his thesis is the question, how did male/female sex come into being. This
issue is referred to as the Queen of evolutionary problems by those who champion
evolution as the answer to life’s existence. One of the major sticking points
is how did the process of asexual reproduction called meiosis evolve into what
we know as sexual reproduction called mitosis. In meiosis, cells divide
producing an exact copy of themselves. In mitosis, two different sets of
chromosomes are mixed to produce a different entity, related to the parents but
distinct from them.
The
story of creation, as recorded in the book of Genesis, is not a scientific treatise
on how God created the world, but a clear and powerful statement that He is the
author of all that we know and don’t yet know. In simple, clear statements, Genesis
outlines a systematic creation event. Although it does not go into detail about
the mechanism of how God created the different components of creation, it does
give us some very important clues to the boundaries that God set for creation.
Particularly relevant to the argument in Smith’s book is Genesis 1:20-25.
And
God said, "Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly
above the earth across the expanse of the sky." So God created the great
creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water
teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind.
And God saw that it was good. God blessed them and said, "Be fruitful and
increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase
on the earth." And there was evening, and there was morning--the fifth
day.
And
God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds:
livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each
according to its kind." And it was so. God made the wild animals according
to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures
that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was
good.
Multiple
times the story records that God created living creatures according to their
kind. The same thing is said about plants. The apex of the creation story comes
with the arrival of man in Genesis 1:26-28.
Then
God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them
rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock,
over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the
ground."
So
God created man in his own image,
in
the image of God he created him;
male
and female he created them.
God blessed them and said to them, "Be
fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the
fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that
moves on the ground."
It
is time for us to take another honest look at a “theory” that has been
presented as an established “fact”. Dr. Smith’s book is a good place to start
an honest dialog. The diversity and complexity of sexual reproduction throughout
the world seriously weakens the idea that all life gradually developed from the
same source, unless we recognize that that source was God.
I always enjoy your posts! The grammar nut in me, however, noticed the typo in "excepted" which, of course, should read "accepted." (The sentence immediately following the Darwin's book title.) I'm finally finishing up reading, "A Shepherd Looks at Psalm 23," too!
ReplyDelete